内容简介
作者简介
目录
With the development of risk society,human is increasingly in a state of severe anxiety.In order to meet necessity in risk society from legislative aspects,it is necessary to conduct systematic study on legislation mechanism in risk society from the theoretical basis and system construction.At present the researches on risk society and legislation studies are respective dispersion and lack of comprehensive study,which are unable to provide powerful theoretical supports for legislation in risk society.And then legislation could not provide sufficient legal basis in the face of risks in risk society.Therefore,the thesis makes a special study on legislation mechanism in risk society,discussing what kind of changes legislation mechanism would occur and how it replies to necessity in risk society.Focusing on this theme,the paper mainly studies on the present condition of legislation mechanism,the theoretical basis,value orientation,basic principles,subject system,power system,procedure system and other issues,which is divided into nine chapters.The first chapter is a review on legislation mechanism in risk society.This chapter reviews and evaluates research achievements in theory of risk society and theory of legislation science at home and abroad.It is found that there are few comprehensive studies of risk society and law,and the results on response to risk society in the field of legislation are even less.Therefore,it is of great theoretical significance to analyze legislation mechanism in risk society.The second chapter is about current situation of legislation mechanism in risk society.China has entered into a high-risk society at present.The risks are including foreign risk and domestic risk,and the former can be divided into in-put risk and involved risk and the latter is composed by the risk of pre-industrial society,industrial society risk of risk in risk society.The main characteristic of social risk in China is complex that risk overlying and coexistence.As judicial and administrative systems are deficient,the only choice for undertaking the important task of dealing with risk society in China is to depend on legislative mechanism.As to international situation,every country takes legislation as primary means to cope with risk society and has formed a relatively sophisticated risk legislation mechanism.China should take example by common experience of international community.The third chapter is about theoretical basis of legislative mechanism in risk society.It starts from the concept of risk law,which refers to uncertainty of violation of fundamental civil rights of citizens caused by allocation of risk conducted by state power.The concept of risk law operating in legal system depends on legislative process.The legislation mechanism is an organic whole which is about the process of interaction among the elements,methods and related principles.Its elements include:legislative value,the principle of legislation,legislative body,legislative authority,legislative procedures,legislative process,and legislation techniques.The target of rule of law in risk society is risk legal country,which can be constructed from power dimension and rights dimension.The legislation mechanism in risk society is a kind of responsive legislation mechanism,risk in which turns to a new kind of legislative principle,named legislative risk principle.The fourth chapter is about value orientation of legislative mechanism in risk society.The value of risk itself is neutral,while people’s risk activities have value preference.Security and order value is the primary value in risk society and the value of fairness and justice is the fundamental value.Risk legislation should integrate values in multi-dimension value system.The value integrating has the following characteristics:openness,dynamic,technicality, great practical criticism and urgency,and the purpose of which is to choose an optimal decision.Security and order value may be in conflict with the value of fairness and justice,which requires risk legislation to integrate values.The integration path means from broad sense to understand security and order value and from a more profound perspective to understand the value of fairness and justice.The fifth chapter is about principle choice of risk legislation in risk society.The basic principle of risk legislation has great importance to smoothly carry out legislative activities.Its selection criteria are:standards of reality,standards of value,legal standards and standards of property.According to these standards,the thesis chooses democratic principle,scientific principle,efficient principle,basic principle of protecting the rights and principle of risk as the basic principles of risk legislation.The requirement of risk society for legislative democratic principles is that ensure open and extensive communication for essence opinions.Public basic rights are under a state of reduction and limitation in risk society,which should especially pay attention to guarantee basic rights.Democratic principle of legislation is means and tool,and basic principle of protecting the rights is purpose.The realization and perfection of the former contributes to the latter.The requirement of risk society for legislative scientific principles is that legislation idea,legislation mechanisim and legislation technique should be scientific.With regard to the application of technique in risk legislation,it should prevent technique utopia.Risk society also is concerned with efficient principle of legislation.Scientific principle and efficient principle are as the means and objectives,effective achievement of either of which would help the realization of the other.The sixth chapter is about the subject system of legislative mechanism in risk society.The connotation of legislative subject should in accordance with practical needs in risk society.From a broad functional prospective,legislative subject includes the decision body and the participation body.The legislative subject must conduct risk perception,which is a legislative reflection of legislator and the public’s consciousness on risk issues.Besides under the influence of general obstructive factors,risk perception also comes under the impact of understanding the role of law and the limited capacity of legislators.As there are difficulties in risk perception,it is necessary for legislative subjects to have risk communication.Risk communication has its functions and models and communication mechanism,which is a way for the public to participate in the legislation and contributes to achieve the acceptability of risk.The seventh chapter is about core construction of legislation mechanism in risk society.The legislative authority is the core problem of legislation mechanism,including distribution system and operational system of legislative authority.The distribution system in risk society is that traditional legislative authority belonging to lawmaker(legislative body)remains the same,but in the face of new social risks,though decision-making power of legislation belonged to lawmaker is still dominant,its partial power should transfer to the public under special circumstance.At the same time,the public’s participation right of legislation should obtain enough attention under the situation of risk society.The operational system of legislative authority is still constrained by procedural system.The general procedure of legislative authority operates in risk society is that risk awareness belonged to lawmakers passes communication procedure and evaluation procedure and then risk analysis of legislation comes into being.And the risk communication procedure and risk evaluation procedure are special legislative procedures in risk society.The decision model of legislative power in risk society differs from that in industrial society.The decision model should realize the transition from industrial society model to risk society model.Public participation of legislation in risk society possesses legitimacy and special function.And public’s direct participation in legislation is more emphasized in risk society.Public participation not just exercises participation rights;the public should be given partial decision-making power in affairs in some fields.The eighth chapter is about procedural system of legislation mechanism in risk society.As procedural system shapes the legality and legitimacy of risk legislation,it is necessary to pay attention to the construction of it.The core of procedural system of legislation mechanism in risk society is risk assessment procedure.Risk assessment of legislation would encounter obstructive factors,which includes factors caused by legislation itself and factors aroused by risk assessment.Risk assessment procedure has to apply appropriate assessment method which is provided with special standards.From the time,it can be divided into special system of pre-risk assessment and general method of risk assessment.The important content of risk assessment procedure is the construction of evaluation index system.The content of index system is that the objective of total layers is to observe the urgency of risk legislation in risk society,and to establish five norm layers and twenty indexes under the total layers.The specific procedures of risk assessment can be divided into common procedures and special procedures.The former consists of three parts,including starting,implement and response.And the latter emphasizes that risk assessment procedure of legislation is a kind of approval procedure.The ninth chapter is about review and development of risklegislation in China.Although to some extent risk legislation has problems,which can be overcome when compared with its effect.Risk legislation pays more attention to promote development with the help of risk between control and development.Although risk legislation in our country has achieved success to some extent,there are more problems and the current situation is difficult to satisfy.Risk legislation just starts in China.A case study of SARS shows that there are many factors have influence on risk legislation in China.And the case study of demolishing villages indicates that legislation at present still lacks corresponding risk awareness,risk communication and risk assessment.Even after eight years,risk legislation in China is still at the fumble condition.In order to respond the practical needs in risk society,the thesis proposes a fundamental policy and framework for action on risk issues.It is not difficult to find that the thesis first systematically investigates into legislation mechanism under the context of risk society after making an overview of the existing related research achievements.It is the unique research way of the paper to study legislation mechanism based on the perspective of risk society.The innovations of this paper include that studying changes in legislation mechanism and responses of legislation mechanism to risk society and adopting multidisciplinary methods,especially statistical method.Keywords:Risk Society;Legislation Mechanism;Risk;Legislation
全部显示∨
何跃军,男,汉族,1983年出生,福建泉州人,宁波大学法学院讲师,主要研究方向为法理学。2001年-2007年中南财经政法大学法学院本硕连读,获法学学士学位与法学理论硕士学位。2011年获中南财经政法大学法学理论专业博士学位。曾任《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》常务副主编;湖北省行为法学会学术委员。现为中国信访与社会稳定研究中心研究人员,浙江省法学会法律文化研究会理事。近3年来在各类期刊,如《南京社会科学》、《东疆学刊》、《北京行政学院学报》、《华东理工大学学报》、《重庆社会科学》等发表论文二十余篇。主持教育部人文社科青年基金项目一项,主持浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目一项和浙江省科技厅软科学研究项目一项,参与多项省部级课题。
全部显示∨
第一章 风险社会立法机制研究综述第一节 风险社会理论研究综述一、国外风险社会理论研究综述(一)基础:乌尔里希·贝克风险社会理论
(二)国外学者风险社会理论综述
二、国内风险社会理论研究综述
第二节 立法学理论研究综述一、国外立法学理论研究综述
二、国内立法学理论研究综述
三、立法过程理论研究综述
四、立法与风险社会研究综述
本章小结
第二章 风险社会立法机制现实考量第一节 问题的缘起:中国风险社会的到来一、中国风险社会的到来:以SARS和甲流为例的说明
二、中国风险事件主体观察
三、中国社会风险现实考察(一)中国社会发生风险主要因素
(二)中国社会主要风险类型
(三)中国社会风险特征
(四)小结:风险对当代中国的冲击
第二节 解决路径之争:立法机制的选择一、司法路径应对风险社会现状检讨
二、行政路径应对风险社会现状检讨
三、选择立法进路的理由
第三节 立法应对风险:各国的共同努力一、各国与欧盟风险立法现状考察(一)日本风险立法现状
(二)德国风险立法现状
(三)法国风险立法现状
(四)英国风险立法现状
(五)欧盟风险立法现状
二、美国风险立法现状考察(一)美国风险管制立法现状
(二)美国风险管制立法问题
三、小结:当下各国风险立法现状
本章小结
第三章 风险社会立法机制理论基础第一节 风险概念法学解释一、诸学科风险概念与启示(一)社会学风险概念
(二)经济学与管理学风险概念
(三)诸学科风险概念启示
二、法学风险概念证成与运作(一)法学风险概念证成
(二)风险问题在法律体系中的运作
第二节 立法与立法机制解释一、立法
二、立法机制(一)立法机制释义
(二)立法机制组成要素
(三)立法机制特点
(四)立法机制状态描述
第三节 风险社会法治目标:风险法治国一、问题的提出:法治与风险社会
二、工业社会法治目标(一)形式法治国
(二)实质法治国
三、风险社会法治目标:风险法治国(一)风险法治国释义
(二)风险法治国权力面向
(三)风险法治国权利面向
(四)小结:风险法治国研究的展开
第四节 风险社会立法机制:回应型立法机制一、风险与立法:在确定性与不确定性之间
二、风险社会立法机制:回应型立法机制
第五节 一个新原则的提出:立法风险原则一、立法风险原则释义(一)风险原则释义
(二)立法风险原则释义
二、立法风险原则的内容(一)立法风险原则实体面向
(二)立法风险原则程序面向
本章小结
第四章 风险社会立法机制价值定位第一节 基本观念:风险价值与风险立法价值一、风险的价值中立性与风险立法的价值倾向性
二、风险立法价值
第二节 风险社会立法的安全与秩序价值一、安全与秩序价值释义(一)安全价值
(二)秩序价值
二、安全与秩序价值研究综述
三、风险社会程序安全价值
第三节 风险社会立法的公平正义价值一、公平正义价值
二、风险社会与公平正义的关联
三、风险社会分配正义问题
第四节 风险社会立法价值整合一、风险社会立法价值整合解释
二、安全秩序价值与公平正义价值的整合(一)可能的冲突
(二)整合思路
本章小结
第五章 风险社会立法机制原则选择第一节 风险立法基本原则的选择一、立法基本原则释义
二、风险立法基本原则选择标准与理由
第二节 立法民主原则与基本权利保障原则一、立法民主原则(一)立法民主原则释义
(二)风险社会对立法民主原则的要求
(三)当前实现立法民主原则的困难
二、基本权利保障原则(一)基本权利保障原则意义与实现
(二)当前基本权利程序保障的困难
三、立法民主原则与基本权利保障原则关系
第三节 立法科学原则与效率原则一、立法科学原则(一)立法科学原则释义
(二)风险社会对立法科学原则的要求
(三)风险社会科技主宰政治批判:技术乌托邦
二、立法效率原则
三、立法科学原则与立法效率原则关系
本章小结
第六章 风险社会立法机制主体制度第一节 风险社会立法主体一、风险社会立法主体释义
二、风险社会立法主体功能说解释
第二节 风险社会立法主体压力一、立法决策主体:立法者的压力
二、立法参与主体:公众的压力
第三节 立法主体风险认知一、立法主体风险认知释义
二、影响立法风险认知因素
三、立法主体风险认知路径
第四节 立法主体风险沟通一、立法风险沟通释义
二、立法风险沟通功能与模式
三、立法风险沟通制度建构(一)立法风险沟通主体
(二)立法风险沟通信息机制
(三)立法风险沟通渠道
四、立法风险沟通与风险可接受性
本章小结
第七章 风险社会立法机制权力制度第一节 风险社会立法权一、立法权释义
二、风险社会立法权分配体制
三、风险社会立法权运行体制(一)立法者风险意识
(二)立法者风险沟通
(三)立法者风险评估
(四)立法者风险决策
第二节 风险社会立法权决策模式转变一、工业社会立法权决策模式(一)工业社会立法权决策动机
(二)工业社会立法权决策程序
(三)工业社会立法权决策特点
二、风险社会立法权决策模式(一)风险社会立法权决策背景
(二)风险社会立法权决策程序
(三)风险社会立法权决策特点
三、立法权风险决策模式之转变:从工业社会到风险社会
第三节 风险社会立法公众参与权一、风险社会立法公众参与正当性
二、风险社会立法公众参与功能
三、当代代议制民主应对风险议题的不足
四、立法公众参与权实现方式
五、公众立法决策权可能的实践领域
本章小结
第八章 风险社会立法机制程序制度第一节 风险社会立法机制程序保障一、通过程序塑造立法合法性与正当性
二、风险立法程序制度的核心:立法风险评估程序(一)风险评估释义
(二)立法风险评估程序的引入
(三)立法风险评估程序特点
(四)立法风险评估程序地位
第二节 立法风险评估阻碍因素一、评估立法事实的困难
二、评估立法价值的困难
三、立法评估主体因素的不确定性
第三节 立法风险评估方法选择一、立法风险评估方法选择标准
二、立法前风险评估:法规影响评估机制(一)程序检讨:当前立法中法案草拟程序体现
(二)困难检讨:当前推动法规影响评估机制困难所在
(三)建议探讨:当前立法实现RIA措施
三、立法风险评估一般方法(一)成本收益方法
(二)博弈论方法
第四节 立法风险评估指标体系一、立法风险评估指标体系功能与变量组划分(一)立法风险评估指标体系功能
(二)立法风险评估变量组划分
二、立法风险评估指标体系特点与构建原则(一)立法风险评估指标体系特点
(二)立法风险评估指标体系构建原则
三、立法风险评估指标来源(一)指标来源一:立法后评估研究文献
(二)指标来源二:国内立法后评估实践状况
(三)指标来源三:国外立法后评估实践状况
(四)指标来源四:专家访谈与问卷
(五)指标来源五:转基因食品风险评估调查问卷
四、立法风险评估指标体系构建(一)立法风险评估指标体系总体设想
(二)立法风险评估指标体系构建与说明
(三)各层次评价指标权重确定
第五节 立法风险评估具体程序一、立法风险评估普通程序(一)立法风险评估发动程序
(二)立法风险评估实施程序
(三)立法风险评估回应程序
二、立法风险评估特殊程序(一)风险社会特殊理性:风险理性
(二)立法风险评估特殊程序:审议式风险评估程序
本章小结
第九章 中国风险立法检讨与发展第一节 中国风险立法现状检讨一、风险管制立法问题分析
二、管制与服务关系阐释
三、当下中国风险管制立法现状
四、个案分析一:由SARS透视影响中国风险管制立法因素
五、个案分析二:由拆村并居透视当下中国风险管制立法(一)《试点办法》与增减挂钩政策缺乏应有的风险沟通
(二)《试点办法》与增减挂钩政策缺乏应有的风险评估
第二节 发展道路:风险议题政策与行动基本框架一、基本框架释义
二、基本框架运行的关键问题
本章小结